Dominant Wavelength and Purity: Naming a Color by Its Spectrum
"Teal" and "sky blue" and "#4ac0a0" all name a color, but none of them tells you its physics. There's an older, more precise way to name a color with two numbers: the single spectral wavelength it most resembles - its dominant wavelength - and how far it sits from white toward that pure color - its purity. Both are read straight off the chromaticity diagram with a ruler. This is the interactive guide to naming color by its spectrum.
Two numbers instead of a name
Every color you can see plots as a point on the CIE chromaticity diagram - the familiar horseshoe. The curved boundary is the spectral locus: the pure, single wavelengths of the rainbow, from about 380 nm violet at one tip to 700 nm red at the other. Near the middle sits white. Every real color lives somewhere between the two: a mix of a pure hue and white.
That geometry gives a beautifully physical way to describe any color. Draw a straight line from the white point, through your color's point, and out to the horseshoe. Where it lands is the dominant wavelength - the spectral hue your color is "made of." And how far along that line your color sits - white at one end, the pure spectral color at the other - is its excitation purity. Hue and saturation, but defined by wavelength and ratio rather than by a name.
Reading it off the diagram
Here's the construction, live. Pick a color and the demo plots it on the chromaticity diagram, draws the line from white through it to the spectral locus, and reads off the dominant wavelength and purity. Move the color around and watch the wavelength slide along the rainbow edge and the purity grow as you head outward from white.
White, through the color, to the locus
The horseshoe is the spectral locus, ticked with wavelengths; the dot at the center is the white
point. Choose a color: the line runs from white through the color to where it meets the locus -
that meeting wavelength is λd. Purity is how far the color sits along that line
(white = 0%, the locus = 100%).
Sliding from white to pure
Fix the dominant wavelength and change only the purity, and you trace a straight line from white out to the spectral locus. At 0% you're at white; at 100% you're at the pure spectral color; in between you get every tint and pastel of that one hue. Same wavelength throughout - only the distance from white changes.
One hue, from pale to pure
Choose a dominant wavelength and slide the purity from 0 to 100%. The swatch travels from white to the fully saturated spectral color, and the marker moves along the line on the mini-diagram. Purity is the saturation axis of this naming scheme.
The purple problem
Purples break the rule. They live in the region below the horseshoe, along the line of
purples that joins the red and violet ends. A line from white through a purple exits along
that straight edge, never touching the curved spectral locus - so a purple has no dominant
wavelength. Instead we extend the line backward through white to the locus and
report that as the complementary wavelength, flagged with a c.
When the line points the wrong way
Pick a color. If the line from white hits the spectral curve, you get a normal dominant wavelength. If it's a purple, the line hits the line of purples instead - so the demo extends it backward through white to find the complementary wavelength (the spectral color opposite the purple). Try a magenta or violet.
Dominant is not peak
A common trap: dominant wavelength is not the same as peak wavelength. Peak is just where a spectrum is tallest; dominant is where the perceived hue points, after the eye weighs the whole spectrum. For a broad or lopsided emitter - a real LED, say - the two can differ by many nanometers. That's why LEDs are specified by dominant wavelength: it's what the color actually looks like.
Where the hue points, not where it's tallest
A model LED spectrum: a peak you can move and widen. The demo marks the peak wavelength (tallest point) and computes the dominant wavelength (the perceived hue via the color-matching functions). Widen or skew the spectrum and watch the two separate.
Where it's used
Dominant wavelength and purity are working tools, not just diagram trivia.
Best practices and pitfalls
Test your understanding
Six questions on dominant wavelength, purity, the complementary case, and dominant-versus-peak. Instant feedback, no scores recorded - a wrong answer comes with a short explanation.
Quick check
Continue your journey
Dominant wavelength lives on the chromaticity diagram and feeds the specification of real sources - here's where to go next.
Chromaticity Diagrams Without the Intimidation
The horseshoe this whole construction is drawn on.
Colorimetry · 8CIE XYZ Explained
The tristimulus values behind the xy coordinates.
Colorimetry · 76The Standard Observer: 2° vs 10° and the Average Eye
The color-matching functions that place the locus.
Physics · 70Emission: Neon, LEDs, and Gas-Discharge Light
Why LEDs are specified by dominant wavelength.
Foundations · 49The Vocabulary of Color: Hue, Saturation, Value, Tint, Tone, and Shade
How purity relates to everyday saturation words.
Colorimetry · 11Metamerism Explained
Why many spectra share one dominant wavelength.