Accessibility law · Asia-Pacific
New Zealand Web Accessibility Standard 1.2 → WCAG 2.2 AA
In New Zealand, the standard to meet is Web Accessibility Standard 1.2 → WCAG 2.2 AA. It binds public service departments and four other central agencies (Police, Defence Force, Parliamentary Counsel Office, NZSIS). This page was reviewed against primary sources on 30 September 2026.
- Standard
- Web Accessibility Standard 1.2 → WCAG 2.2 AA
- Private sector
- Partly
- Accessibility statement
- Not required
- Next deadline
- 2027
- Reviewed
- 30 September 2026
Scope
Who it applies to
Public service departments and four other central agencies must make every public and internal web page they are responsible for meet WCAG 2.2 AA under the Web Accessibility Standard 1.2, in force since 17 March 2025, and must assess and report conformance when the Government Chief Digital Officer asks. There is no accessibility law for businesses; the Human Rights Act only bans disability discrimination in supplying goods and services, enforced through complaints. A broader Digital Accessibility Standard covering apps, documents, software and hardware is expected in early 2027.
Public sector
Public service departments, the New Zealand Police, the New Zealand Defence Force, the Parliamentary Counsel Office and the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service, under a 2003 Cabinet directive. Other public bodies, such as Crown entities and local councils, are not named in the mandate. Government acts must also not discriminate, under Part 1A of the Human Rights Act.
Private sector
PartlyNo digital accessibility obligation. Section 44 of the Human Rights Act 1993 makes it unlawful to refuse or treat someone less favorably because of disability when supplying goods, facilities or services to the public, but section 52 lets a supplier refuse or set more onerous terms if the disability requires a special manner of service that it cannot reasonably be expected to provide. The Accessibility for New Zealanders Bill, criticized for lacking enforceable standards, was discharged on 14 August 2024.
Coverage
What it covers
Websites are only part of it. Each tile says whether these rules reach that kind of product, with the detail.
Websites
CoveredEvery public and internal web page a mandated agency is responsible for, including web apps.
Mobile apps
PartlyWeb apps and single-page apps count as web pages; native mobile apps are not covered until the planned Digital Accessibility Standard.
Documents
Not coveredThe standard covers web pages only; PDFs and other non-web documents are proposed for the Digital Accessibility Standard.
Software
Not coveredNot covered; the draft Digital Accessibility Standard would cover non-web software.
Kiosks and terminals
Not coveredNot covered; the draft Digital Accessibility Standard would cover hardware, including kiosks.
Public procurement
UnclearThe Web Standards do not address procurement; the Government Procurement Rules were not checked.
Timeline
Deadlines
Next: 2027. The Digital Accessibility Standard is expected to be published in early 2027 and to replace the Web Accessibility Standard.
Dates move, so check the linked source before you plan around one.
2003 In force
Cabinet directs public service and non-public service departments to apply the government web guidelines, now the Web Standards.
14 Aug 2024 In force
The Accessibility for New Zealanders Bill is discharged and will not become law.
17 Mar 2025 In force
Web Accessibility Standard 1.2 (WCAG 2.2 AA) and Web Usability Standard 1.4 take effect.
Jun 2025 In force
The GCDO starts scanning government websites with its automated checker, CWAC, and publishing the results.
13 Jul 2026 In force
Public consultation on the draft Digital Accessibility Standard opens (it closed on 7 August 2026).
2027 Expected
The Digital Accessibility Standard is expected to be published in early 2027 and to replace the Web Accessibility Standard.
Instruments
The law in New Zealand
5 laws, rules and rulings, oldest first. Each links to its primary source.
Every fact points at a primary source. Dates move, and several moved in 2025 and 2026, so check the source before you rely on one.
1993
Human Rights Act 1993
ss. 20L, 21, 44, 52, 92B, 92I and 92M
Bans disability discrimination in supplying goods, facilities and services to the public (s. 44), subject to a reasonableness exception (s. 52). Government acts are tested against s. 19 of the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990 (Part 1A). Names no technical standard; enforced through complaints and the Human Rights Review Tribunal.
2003
Cabinet Minute CAB Min (03) 41/2B
New Zealand Government Web Guidelines: Mandatory Requirements
Directed public service and non-public service departments to implement the government web guidelines. It is still the legal basis for the Web Accessibility and Web Usability Standards.
2022
Accessibility for New Zealanders Bill (153-2)
Government bill, introduced 2022; discharged 14 August 2024
Would have set up an Accessibility Committee to advise the Minister for Disability Issues on accessibility barriers. Critics, including National Party members of the select committee, said it lacked enforceable standards. It was discharged and never became law.
Mar 2025 Latest
NZ Government Web Accessibility Standard 1.2
Government Chief Digital Officer; issued with the Web Usability Standard 1.4
Every publicly and internally facing web page a mandated agency is responsible for must conform to WCAG 2.2 Level AA, with modified rules for complex maps, live captions and audio description, and an exemption for inactive pages. Agencies must assess, report and plan fixes when the GCDO asks.
Jul 2026
Digital Accessibility Standard (draft)
GCDO public consultation, 13 July to 7 August 2026
Proposed replacement for the Web Accessibility Standard, likely to cover all ICT: websites, mobile apps, non-web documents, software and hardware such as kiosks. Which agencies it will bind is not yet confirmed. Expected in early 2027.
Enforcement
Enforcement and penalties
Who enforces
The Government Chief Digital Officer (GCDO) for the Web Standards; the Human Rights Commission and the Human Rights Review Tribunal for discrimination.
How
When notified by the GCDO, each mandated agency must assess its websites against the standard, report conformance, and submit a risk assessment and risk management plan. Since June 2025 the GCDO also scans government websites with its automated checker (CWAC) and publishes the results on data.govt.nz. Discrimination complaints go to the Human Rights Commission and can then go to the Tribunal.
Penalties
The Web Standards carry no penalties. Under the Human Rights Act the Tribunal can make declarations and restraining orders, order the defendant to redress loss or to undertake training or adopt policies, and award damages, including for humiliation, loss of dignity and injury to feelings; the Act sets no fixed amounts.
Individuals
Yes, for discrimination: a person can complain to the Human Rights Commission and bring civil proceedings in the Human Rights Review Tribunal, and the Commission can bring proceedings for a class of people. The Act does not mention WCAG, so a claim must show discrimination, not just a failed success criterion.
Accessibility statement
No statement is required
Not required. The Web Usability Standard 1.4 requires contact details (including a link to the NZ Relay service), a copyright statement and privacy statements, but no accessibility statement. The government says accessibility statements will be considered under the new Digital Accessibility Standard.
Exemptions
What is exempt
Exemptions are narrow and usually have to be claimed and explained, not assumed.
- Complex visual maps need no equivalent text alternative, but their data should be published in open formats on data.govt.nz.
- Inactive web pages: no longer needed, not updated, marked as inactive and offering an accessible version on request.
- Live captions are a 'should', and a 'must' only for high-stakes information not published as text at the same time.
- Audio description is a 'should' for prerecorded video published on or after 17 March 2025, and a 'must' for high-stakes information or services.
- Human Rights Act s. 52: a supplier need not provide a service in a special manner it cannot reasonably be expected to provide.
The standard
What WCAG 2.2 Level AA asks for
55 success criteria: 31 at Level A and 24 at Level AA.
1. Perceivable
- 1.1.1Non-text ContentA
- 1.2.1Audio-only and Video-only (Prerecorded)A
- 1.2.2Captions (Prerecorded)A
- 1.2.3Audio Description or Media Alternative (Prerecorded)A
- 1.2.4Captions (Live)AA
- 1.2.5Audio Description (Prerecorded)AA
- 1.3.1Info and RelationshipsA
- 1.3.2Meaningful SequenceA
- 1.3.3Sensory CharacteristicsA
- 1.3.4OrientationAANew in 2.1
- 1.3.5Identify Input PurposeAANew in 2.1
- 1.4.1Use of ColorA
- 1.4.2Audio ControlA
- 1.4.3Contrast (Minimum)AA
- 1.4.4Resize TextAA
- 1.4.5Images of TextAA
- 1.4.10ReflowAANew in 2.1
- 1.4.11Non-text ContrastAANew in 2.1
- 1.4.12Text SpacingAANew in 2.1
- 1.4.13Content on Hover or FocusAANew in 2.1
2. Operable
- 2.1.1KeyboardA
- 2.1.2No Keyboard TrapA
- 2.1.4Character Key ShortcutsANew in 2.1
- 2.2.1Timing AdjustableA
- 2.2.2Pause, Stop, HideA
- 2.3.1Three Flashes or Below ThresholdA
- 2.4.1Bypass BlocksA
- 2.4.2Page TitledA
- 2.4.3Focus OrderA
- 2.4.4Link Purpose (In Context)A
- 2.4.5Multiple WaysAA
- 2.4.6Headings and LabelsAA
- 2.4.7Focus VisibleAA
- 2.4.11Focus Not Obscured (Minimum)AANew in 2.2
- 2.5.1Pointer GesturesANew in 2.1
- 2.5.2Pointer CancellationANew in 2.1
- 2.5.3Label in NameANew in 2.1
- 2.5.4Motion ActuationANew in 2.1
- 2.5.7Dragging MovementsAANew in 2.2
- 2.5.8Target Size (Minimum)AANew in 2.2
3. Understandable
- 3.1.1Language of PageA
- 3.1.2Language of PartsAA
- 3.2.1On FocusA
- 3.2.2On InputA
- 3.2.3Consistent NavigationAA
- 3.2.4Consistent IdentificationAA
- 3.2.6Consistent HelpANew in 2.2
- 3.3.1Error IdentificationA
- 3.3.2Labels or InstructionsA
- 3.3.3Error SuggestionAA
- 3.3.4Error Prevention (Legal, Financial, Data)AA
- 3.3.7Redundant EntryANew in 2.2
- 3.3.8Accessible Authentication (Minimum)AANew in 2.2
4. Robust
Meeting it
Where to start
The standard named here is WCAG 2.2 Level AA.
- Audit your pages against WCAG 2.2 Level AA: 55 success criteria at Level A and AA.
- Check text and control contrast in the Contrast Checker.
- Run the URL Analyzer for the problems a machine can find, then test with a keyboard and a screen reader.
- Work through the Accessibility Checklist and keep a record of what you tested.
This is a summary to orient you, not legal advice. For a decision that matters, read the primary sources and ask a lawyer who practices there.
Questions
Common questions
Does it apply to private companies?
No accessibility standard applies to businesses. The Human Rights Act bans refusing a service or treating someone less favorably because of disability, but a supplier is not in breach if the person needs a special manner of service that it cannot reasonably be expected to provide. Complaints go to the Human Rights Commission.
Do councils and Crown entities have to comply?
Not under the current Web Standards, which name only public service departments, the Police, the Defence Force, the Parliamentary Counsel Office and the NZSIS. The government has said it will recommend that the new Digital Accessibility Standard apply to more public sector organizations, but which ones is not yet confirmed.
Which WCAG version do government sites need?
WCAG 2.2 Level AA since 17 March 2025, under the Web Accessibility Standard 1.2. It replaced version 1.1, which required WCAG 2.1 AA from 1 July 2019.
Is there an Accessibility for New Zealanders Act?
No. The Accessibility for New Zealanders Bill was reported back by select committee but discharged on 14 August 2024, so it never became law.
Sources
Sources
Every fact on this page comes from one of these; the few secondary sources are marked. Reviewed 30 September 2026.
- digital.govt.nz: Web Accessibility Standard 1.2 digital.govt.nz
- digital.govt.nz: Web Usability Standard 1.4 digital.govt.nz
- digital.govt.nz: Web Standards effective from March 2025 digital.govt.nz
- digital.govt.nz: Digital Accessibility Standard (DAS) digital.govt.nz
- digital.govt.nz: Centralised Web Accessibility Checker (CWAC) digital.govt.nz
- digital.govt.nz: Web Standards Cabinet Minute and Paper digital.govt.nz
- digital.govt.nz: NZ Government Web Standards digital.govt.nz
- digital.govt.nz: Web Standards Self-Assessments digital.govt.nz
- digital.govt.nz: Web Accessibility Standard 1.1 (Internet Archive, 2021) web.archive.org
- Human Rights Act 1993 (legislation.govt.nz) legislation.govt.nz
- Human Rights Act 1993 (Internet Archive copy read, June 2024) web.archive.org
- Accessibility for New Zealanders Bill 153-2 (legislation.govt.nz) legislation.govt.nz
- Accessibility for New Zealanders Bill, marked discharged 14 August 2024 (Internet Archive copy read, October 2024) web.archive.org
- Draft Accessibility Standards Bill, member's bill for consultation, 23 June 2026 (hosted by Scoop) img.scoop.co.nz
Elsewhere
Also in Asia-Pacific
- INIndiaGIGW 3.0 → WCAG 2.1 AA · IS 17802
- JPJapanJIS X 8341-3:2016 → WCAG 2.0 AA
- KRSouth KoreaKWCAG 2.2 (KS X OT0003:2022)
- CNChinaGB/T 37668-2019 (recommended; draws on WCAG 2.0 and 2.1)
- AUAustraliaWCAG 2.2 AA for government — the DDA names no standard
Other regions
- USUnited StatesWCAG 2.1 AA (ADA Title II, HHS Section 504) — Section 508 still WCAG 2.0 AA
- CACanadaCAN/ASC-EN 301 549:2024 → WCAG 2.1 AA (federal, from Dec 2027) — Ontario AODA: WCAG 2.0 AA
- BRBrazilLBI art. 63 → "international guidelines"; eMAG 3.1 for government; ABNT NBR 17225:2025 (WCAG 2.2) voluntary
- EUEuropean UnionEN 301 549 V3.2.1 → WCAG 2.1 AA
- UKUnited KingdomWCAG 2.2 AA
- FRFranceRGAA 4.1.2 → WCAG 2.1 AA
- DEGermanyBITV 2.0 → EN 301 549 → WCAG 2.1 AA
- ITItalyAgID guidelines → EN 301 549 → WCAG 2.1 AA
- ESSpainEN 301 549 V3.2.1 → WCAG 2.1 AA
- NLNetherlandsEN 301 549 → WCAG 2.1 AA
- IEIrelandEN 301 549 V3.2.1 → WCAG 2.1 AA
- NONorwayEN 301 549 V3.2.1 → WCAG 2.1 AA (public); WCAG 2.0 AA less 3 criteria (private)
- CHSwitzerlandeCH-0059 v3.0 → WCAG 2.1 AA
- ILIsraelIS 5568 → WCAG 2.0 AA